1. The people of Cochabamba were protesting the privatization of their water system because they felt that water is a basic human right. Do you agree with this belief or do you think water is a commodity that can be bought and sold? Keep in mind that even if it is a human right, there are costs associated with obtaining, purifying, and distributing water. Who do you think should pay for these cost? Where should the money come from?
I agree that water should be a basic human right, but obtaining, purifying and distributing water costs money and people should pay a little bit for this right. I think that the government should make compromises with the people in setting the price for water. The money should come from the people and the government.
2. In light of the above statements, how should developing countries deal with the problems associated with a lack of clean, fresh water?
Developing countries should ask other countries for advice on how to have more clean and fresh water. Also regarding costs, these countries should divert most costs to bettering public health than private companies.
3. Bechtel is a multinational corporation and, like all corporations, the main goal is profit. Do you think Bechtel should profit from the management of a water system? If not, what should their incentive be? If so, what restrictions, if any, should be imposed?
No, Bechtel should not profit from the management of a water system. Their incentive should be that the more public health, the more people can work for their company and bring in more income.
4. Do you think Cochabamba’s conflict is foreshadowing the future with more wars being fought over water? Can you think of other examples where access to water is being contested?
Yes, I think this conflict could lead to wars over water. Drought and irrigation problems could be examples of water being contested.
No comments:
Post a Comment